Appeal No. 97-1002
Application 08/014,379
art. Accordingly, we do not sustain this rejection of claims 4,
5 and 14-17.
5. The rejection of claims 18 and 19 as
unpatentable over Zisa, Melanson, Dell
Orfano, Brady and Rozanski.
This rejection is just like the second rejection
discussed above except that Dell Orfano is again added to the
combination of patents used to reject these claims. For the same
reasons we have just discussed, Dell Orfano does not overcome the
deficiencies previously noted in the rejection of claims 18 and
19. Therefore, we also do not sustain this rejection of claims
18 and 19.
In summary, we have not sustained any of the examiner’s
rejections of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of
the examiner rejecting claims 4, 5 and 14-21 is reversed.
REVERSED
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007