Appeal No. 97-2504 Application 08/200,707 (UK Patent Application) Kogo 0,383,330 Aug. 22, 1990 (European Patent Application) We note that the final rejection included a rejection of claims 1 and 3 under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112. Three problems were indicated in paragraphs numbered 1(a) through 1(c) of the final rejection. Appellants filed an amendment after final rejection on August 31, 1995. Although this amendment was denied entry by the examiner, appellants were notified that the Section 112 rejection of paragraphs 1(a) and 1(b) would be overcome by a separately filed amendment [advisory action, Paper #10]. Appellants filed a second amendment after final rejection on January 23, 1996 directed to the rejection under Section 112. The examiner indicated that this amendment would be entered upon appeal and that the Section 112, paragraph 2 rejection of claims 1 and 3 had been overcome [advisory action, Paper #16]. No mention was made of the separate rejections set forth in paragraphs 1(a) through 1(c) of the final rejection. The appeal brief in this case has noted that the Section 112 rejection of paragraphs 1(a) and 1(b) has been overcome, and no further discussion of the Section 112 rejection as set forth in the final rejection is offered. The examiner’s answer repeated the final 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007