Ex parte KANO et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-2504                                                          
          Application 08/200,707                                                      


          (UK Patent Application)                                                     
          Kogo                          0,383,330          Aug. 22, 1990              
          (European Patent Application)                                               


          We note that the final rejection included a rejection of                    
          claims 1 and 3 under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112.               
          Three problems were indicated in paragraphs numbered 1(a) through           
          1(c) of the final rejection.  Appellants filed an amendment after           
          final rejection on August 31, 1995.  Although this amendment was            
          denied entry by the examiner, appellants were notified that the             
          Section 112 rejection of paragraphs 1(a) and 1(b) would be                  
          overcome by a separately filed amendment [advisory action, Paper            
          #10].  Appellants filed a second amendment after final rejection            
          on January 23, 1996 directed to the rejection under Section 112.            
          The examiner indicated that this amendment would be entered upon            
          appeal and that the Section 112, paragraph 2 rejection of claims            
          1 and 3 had been overcome [advisory action, Paper #16].  No                 
          mention was made of the separate rejections set forth in                    
          paragraphs 1(a) through 1(c) of the final rejection.  The appeal            
          brief in this case has noted that the Section 112 rejection of              
          paragraphs 1(a) and 1(b) has been overcome, and no further                  
          discussion of the Section 112 rejection as set forth in the final           
          rejection is offered.  The examiner’s answer repeated the final             

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007