Ex parte STURM et al. - Page 13




          Appeal No. 97-3187                                                          
          Application No. 07/999,422                                                  


          has two faces, and (2) the binding filament and the trim                    
          filament being of different constructions.                                  


               With respect to the web having two faces, it is our                    
          opinion that such a limitation is inherently present in the                 
          web recited in claim 1 from U.S. Patent No. 4,901,661.                      


               With respect to the binding filament and the trim                      
          filament being of different constructions, we note that claim               
          3 from U.S. Patent No. 4,901,661 recites that the trim                      
          filament is of metallic thread and the binding filament is a                
          solid monofilament.                                                         


               It is our opinion that claim 3 from U.S. Patent No.                    
          4,901,661 can be equated to a species of the invention, while               
          pending claim 1 can be equated to a genus of the invention.                 
          However, the generic invention of pending claim 1 is                        
          "anticipated" by the species of the patented invention (i.e.,               
          claim 3 from U.S. Patent No. 4,901,661).  See Goodman,                      
          11 F.3d at 1053,  29 USPQ2d at 2016.  Thus, without a terminal              
          disclaimer, the species claims preclude issuance of the                     
                                          13                                          





Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007