Interference No. 103,208
Hoshino et al. v. Tanaka
LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINAL DECISION
In this interference, junior party Hoshino et al.
(Hoshino) relies solely on the earlier filing dates of
previously filed United States and Japanese applications to
which it claims benefit, to establish the case for priority.
For party Hoshino, the earliest accorded benefit date is
January 22, 1986 (based on the Administrative Patent Judge’s
granting of Hoshino’s motion for benefit). For party Tanaka,
the earliest accorded benefit date is October 2, 1985 (based
on the Administrative Patent Judge’s granting of Tanaka’s
motion for benefit).
At final hearing, the parties seek review only of the
Administrative Patent Judge (APJ)’s decision on various
preliminary and miscellaneous motions filed by the parties.
On September 12, 1995, the APJ issued a decision on
motions which decided party Hoshino’s motions H1 through H7
and party Tanaka’s motions T1 through T12. For clarification
purposes, the list of motions decided by the APJ is
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007