Interference No. 103,208
Hoshino et al. v. Tanaka
07/005,241 and Japanese application 61-12391.
(Unopposed)
H7 Hoshino et al.'s motion (Paper No. 12) under 37
CFR § 1.633(a) that Tanaka's claims 34-39 are
unpatentable to Tanaka. (Unopposed)
T1 Tanaka's Motion for Benefit under 37 CFR
§ 1.633(f) (Paper No. 9), of the filing dates of
Japanese applications 61-058453 (March 17, 1986)
and 60-219521 (October 2, 1985). (Opp. Paper
No. 35) (Reply Paper No. 54)
T2 Tanaka's Motion to Redefine I, under 37 CFR
§ 1.633(c)(2) and (i) by amending his claims 34-
38 and by canceling his claim 39. (Paper No.
24) (Opp. Paper No. 42) (Reply Paper No. 59)
T3 Tanaka's Motion to Redefine II, under 37 CFR §
1.633(c)(1) and (c)(2), by substituting proposed
count T-1 for count 1 and adding Tanaka's
claims 54 and 55, and Contingent Motion to
Add Count T-1. (Paper No. 23) (Opp. Paper
No. 43) (Reply Paper No. 57)
T4 Tanaka's contingent motion under 37 CFR
§ 1.633(c)(3) to designate claims 30-32 of
Hoshino et al.'s reissue application 08/204,661
as not corresponding to count 1. (Paper No. 26)
(Opp. Paper No. 36) (Reply Paper No. 56)
T5 Tanaka's contingent motion (Paper No. 27) under
37 CFR § 1.633(a) for judgment on the ground
that Hoshino et al.'s reissue application claims
18-33 are unpatentable to Hoshino et al. (Opp.
Paper No. 39)
T6 Tanaka's motion (Paper No. 28) under 37 CFR
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007