HOSHINO et al V. TANAKA - Page 3




          Interference No. 103,208                                                    
          Hoshino et al. v. Tanaka                                                    

          reproduced below:                                                           
          H1        Hoshino et al.'s motion (Paper No. 13) under                      
                    37 CFR § 1.633(h) to add reissue application                      
                    08/204,661 of Hoshino et al.'s involved patent                    
                    to this interference.  (Unopposed)                                
          H2        Hoshino et al.'s motion (Paper No. 14) under                      
                    37 CFR § (c)(1) to add proposed counts 2, 3 and                   
                    4; under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(3) to designate                        
                    various claims of both parties as corresponding                   
                    to proposed counts 2-4; under 37 CFR §                            
                    1.633(c)(4) to                                                    



                    designate various claims of both parties as                       
                    not corresponding to count 1; and under 37                        
                    CFR § 1.633(c)(5) to require Tanaka to add                        
                    claims 40-53. (Opp. Paper No. 22) (Reply                          
                    Paper No. 44)                                                     
          H3        Hoshino et al.'s motion (Paper No. 16) under                      
                    37 CFR § 1.633(f) for benefit of parent                           
                    application 08/005,241 (January 20, 1987) and                     
                    Japanese application 61-12391 (January 22,                        
                    1986).  (Unopposed)                                               
          H4        Hoshino et al.'s contingent motion (Paper                         
                    No. 17) under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(3) to                             
                    alternatively designate certain claims to                         
                    various proposed counts 2, 3 and 4.  (Opp. Paper                  
                    No. 25) (Reply Paper No. 45)                                      
          H5        Hoshino et al.'s motion (Paper No. 34) to excuse                  
                    delay in opposing Tanaka's motion for benefit.                    
                    (Opp. Paper No. 53) (Reply Paper No. 66).                         
          H6        Hoshino et al.'s contingent motion (Paper                         
                    No. 41) under 37 CFR §§ 1.633(f) and (j) to                       
                    obtain the benefit of U.S. Application                            
                                        - 3 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007