Interference No. 103,208
Hoshino et al. v. Tanaka
§ 1.633(a) for judgment that involved patent
claim 17 of Hoshino et al is unpatentable to
Hoshino et al. (Unopposed)
T7 Tanaka's contingent motion under 37 CFR
§ 1.633(f) for benefit of Japanese applications
60-219521 and 61-058543. (Paper No. 29) (Opp.
Paper No. 37) (Reply Paper No. 58)
T8 Tanaka's motion (Paper No. 31) to excuse delay
in filing certain preliminary motions. (Opp.
Paper No. 38) (Reply Paper No. 55).
T9 Tanaka's contingent motion under 37 CFR
§ 1.633(c)(4) to redefine by designating
Tanaka's claims 6, 8-11, 13 and 14 as not
corresponding to count 1 or any count. (Paper
No. 30) (Opp. Paper No. 43)
T10 Tanaka's motion or request for returning Hoshino
et al.'s reply and accompanying second
declaration of Ken Utagawa to Tanaka's
opposition to Hoshino et al.'s Motion H2.
(Paper No. 60) (Opp. Paper No. 65) (Reply Paper
No. 72).
T11 Tanaka's contingent motion (Paper No. 70) under
37 CFR § 1.633(c)(5) to require Hoshino et al.
to
add back to Hoshino et al.'s reissue
application cancelled claims 30-32. (Opp.
Paper No. 71)
T12 Tanaka's motion to excuse delay (Paper No. 69)
in filing Tanaka's contingent motion to require
Hoshino et al. to add back to Hoshino et al.'s
reissue application cancelled claims 30-32.
- 5 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007