THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 45
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAISUKI UEDA and HIROMITSU TAKAGI
_____________
Appeal No. 94-2080
Application 07/982,0681
______________
HEARD: June 13, 1995
_______________
Before HARKCOM, Vice-Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
JERRY SMITH and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.2
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 7-11. 1-6 have been
Application filed November 23, 1992. According to Appellants this1
application is a continuation of application no. 07/624,519, filed December 7,
1990, which is a continuation of application no. 07/518,328, filed May 5,
1990, which is a continuation of application no. 07/376,374, filed July 5,
1989, which is a divisional of application no. 07/122,603, filed November 18,
1987, which is a continuation of application no. 06/509,055, filed June 29,
1983.
Administrative Patent Judge Raymond Cardillo who sat at the oral2
hearing has retired and Administrative Patent Judge Jerry Smith has been
substituted in his place in this Appeal. See, In re Bose, 772 F.2d 866, 227
USPQ 1 (Fed. Cir. 1985).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007