Appeal No. 94-2156 Application 07/888,366 which is prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(f) as evidenced by the co-authorship of Lee I and/or Lee II. Claims 3 and 4 read: 3. A cDNA molecule, HEV1, free of other DNA molecules naturally occurring with the DNA molecule, corresponding to the DNA sequence of Figure 2 as carried in E. coli ATCC 68363 which encodes a protein. 4. A single strand cDNA molecule, HEV1, free of other DNA molecules naturally occurring with the DNA molecule, which encodes a protein corresponding to the 204 amino acid sequence in Figure 2. 2. Discussion A. Obviousness in view of Walujono, Broekaert & Weissman As viewed by the examiner, the issue on appeal is whether HEV1, which corresponds to the cDNA sequence of Figure 2 and the cDNA sequence which encodes the protein corresponding to the 204 amino acid sequence in Figure 2, would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art in view of (1) prior art teaching of the 43 amino acid sequence for mature hevein, including an internal Trp-Gly-Trp-Cys sequence (Walujono, p. 519), (2) recognition in the art that hevein has antifungal - 4 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007