THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 47
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte EUGENE B. DOWDLE
________________
Appeal No. 95-0155
Application No. 07/890,3351
________________
HEARD: August 5, 1998
________________
Before WINTERS, GRON and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision
rejecting claims 69, 70, 72 through 78, 80 through 84, 87
1Application for patent filed May 26, 1992. According
to applicant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/150,475, filed January 28, 1988; which is a
continuation of Application No. 06/843,405, filed March 24,
1986; which is a continuation of Application No. 06/559,569,
filed December 8, 1983; which is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 06/513,145, filed July 12, 1983, all of which
were abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007