Appeal No. 95-0155 Application No. 07/890,335 DISCUSSION Initially, we agree with the examiner's finding that the claimed pharmaceutical composition and method are not described by European Patent Application 0 041 766 within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. � 102. We have carefully reviewed European Patent Application 0 041 766 in its entirety, including the claims therein. At best, this reference suggests that pro-tPA has "sufficient binding capacity to fibrin" and behaves "in the same way" as tPA when subjected to immunodiffusion analysis and quenching experiments (European Patent Application 0 041 766, Example 4, last paragraph). This reference teaches the use of tPA, not pro-tPA, as a pharmaceutical. See claims 18 and 19 of European Patent Application 0 041 766, drawn to a pharmaceutical composition and a method of preparing a pharmaceutical composition, which depend from claims 1 through 3 but exclude the subject matter of claim 4 drawn to pro-tPA. Contrary to what a person having ordinary skill would have expected at the time the invention was made, per the teachings of European Patent Application 0 041 766, applicant's specification describes the superiority of pro-tPA -6-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007