THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN P. GIBSON, ALEXANDER GOUDIE,
KELVIN S. HOLDOM and JOHN D. BU’LOCK
____________
Appeal No. 95-0576
Application 08/035,5461
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and GRON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
Application for patent filed March 23, 1993. According to1
applicants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/786,691, filed November 1, 1991, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application 07/142,888, filed January 11, 1988, now
U.S. Patent 5,089,480, patented February 18, 1992; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 06/886,867, filed July 16, 1986,
now abandoned. Applicants claim the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of
the July 27, 1985, August 9, 1985, April 24, 1986, and May 2, 1986,
filing dates of United Kingdom Applications 8,518,999, 8,520,069,
8,610,063, and 8,610,862, respectively.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007