Ex parte GIBSON et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 95-0576                                                          
          Application 08/035,546                                                      
               B.   Mrozik                                                            
               Mrozik describes a series of avermectin compounds which are            
          naturally produced by, and isolated from the fermentation broth             
          of, Streptomyces avermitilis (Mrozik, column 1, lines 6-8).  The            
          examiner finds that the compounds Mrozik describes are identical            
          to compounds appellants claim but for the substituent groups                
          at the 25-position (Examiner’s Answer, pages 2-3, bridging                  
          sentence).  Mrozik’s compounds have a methyl, ethyl, isopropyl              
          or sec-butyl group at the 25-position (Mrozik, column 1, line 63,           
          and column 2, lines 10-19).  Mrozik’s compounds with an isopropyl           
          or sec-butyl group at the 25-position are homologues of the                 
          compounds appellants claim with an “alpha-branched C -C  alkyl              
                                                              5  8                    
          . . . group” at the corresponding 25-position.                              
               C.   GB 2,166,436                                                      
               GB 2,166,436 (GB) describes a series of antibiotic compounds           
          which “may be prepared by culturing certain Streptomyces strains,           
          in particular Streptomyces thermoarchaensis NC1B 12015" (GB,                
          Abstract).  The examiner finds that GB describes compounds which            
          are “closely analogous” to compounds described by Mrozik and                
          certain compounds provisionally excluded from appellants’ claims            
          (Examiner’s Answer, page 4, lines 1-5).  The significant                    
          difference between the compounds which are not expressly excluded           
          from appellants’ claims and the “closely analogous” compounds GB            

                                        - 4 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007