THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN A. COSTELLO, HARRY BUHAY,
RICHARD R. PAPANIA, PROSENJIT RAI-CHOUDHURY,
KENNETH J. PETROSKY and GENE A. MADIA
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0638
Application 08/011,0941
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed January 29, 1993. According
to the applicants this application is a continuation of
Application 07/793,233, filed November 8, 1991, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 07/453,287, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007