Ex parte COSTELLO et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-0638                                                          
          Application 08/011,094                                                      


                    a substrate having a ceramic core with first and                  
          second opposite planar surfaces, each of the planar surfaces                
          having a layer of copper with a thickness in the range of                   
          approximately 0.5 to 7 mils bonded to each of the planar surfaces           
          by a metallic film;                                                         
                    a layer of nickel having a thickness substantially                
          less than the copper layer plated on the copper layer, at least a           
          portion of the first planar surface being electrically isolated             
          from the base member for supporting a plurality of power                    
          transistors, the copper layer having the characteristics and                
          thickness to spread heat from power microwave transistors mounted           
          on the electrically isolated planar surface, the second planar              
          surface being brazed to the metallic base member; and                       
                    a frame assembly brazed to a metallic surface                     
          surrounding and spaced from the electrically isolated planar                
          surface of the substrate for connecting electrically at least two           
          terminals exterior the respective package, the two terminals                
          being electrically isolated from the substrate and the base                 
          member and from each other.                                                 
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Freedman et al. (Freedman)        3,814,633      June 04, 1974              
          Kurihara et al. (Kurihara ’899)   4,556,899      Dec. 03, 1985              
          Kurihara et al. (Kurihara ’733)   59-175733      Oct. 04, 1984              
          (Japanese Kokai)                                                            
          The admitted prior art of appellants’ Figure 13.                            
          Claims 1-15, 36-43, 45-49 and 74-89 stand rejected under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers            
          the admitted prior art of appellants’ Figure 13 in view of the              
          teachings of either Kurihara ’733 or Freedman.  Claims 76-79                
          stand additionally rejected based on the admitted prior art in              
          view of Kurihara ’899.                                                      

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007