Appeal No. 95-1217 Application 08/039,674 class, each class being a known pattern that the system is looking to identify. See col. 3, lines 33-35, 47-49. The "neural networks operate in parallel and as a whole configure a single neural network system." See col. 3, lines 49-51. Each of the neural networks NET judges whether the input i feature vector belongs to the class C , see col. 3, lines 62- i 65, and outputs the probability that the feature vector belongs to that class. See col. 4, lines 4-8. The judgment unit 14 then judges which of the classes is likely to be the correct class, based on the probability data output from the neural networks, and outputs a result. See col. 4, lines 11-21. The rejection of claims 1 through 6 turns on how the term "distinct" in claim 1 is interpreted. During patent prosecution, claims must be given their broadest reasonable interpretation. See In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054-55, 44 USPQ2d 1023, 1027-29 (Fed. Cir. 1997). The first place to look when interpreting a patent claim is the words of the claim themselves. See 18Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007