Appeal No. 95-1515
Application 08/027,656
the camera as
taught in the first group of references (Vitou, Black,
Mumpower and Wyller) to obtain a photographic apparatus for
attachment to a camera lens for simultaneously creating a
single slide transparency or photograph from a plurality of
slide transparen-cies having distinct images exposed thereon
as recited in Appellant's claim 1.
Appellant further points out on pages 4 and 5 of the
brief that the second group of references (Vitou, Black,
Mumpower and Wyller) makes a single photograph from two
photographs where the two photographs are of an image
simultaneously photographed from two angles. Appellant
argues that since the two photographs are of the same image
viewed from two different angles that the two
photograph are not two different slide transparencies.
We disagree. Vitou, Black, Mumpower and Wyller teach
that the photographs are not the same image but the same
subject viewed from two different angles. Furthermore, we
note that Appellant's claim 1 language only requires that the
slide transparencies have distinct images exposed thereon.
The claim language does not preclude images of the same
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007