Appeal No. 95-1515 Application 08/027,656 this evidence in order to establish a prima facie case. In re Knapp-Monarch Co., 296 F.2d 230, 232, 132 USPQ 6, 8 (CCPA 1961); In re Cofer, 354 F.2d 664, 668, 148 USPQ 268, 271-72 (CCPA 1966). In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1 through 4, 6 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed; however, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 5, 8 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JAMES T. CARMICHAEL ) 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007