THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WALTER WEISHAUPT
__________
Appeal No. 95-2730
Application 08/169,959
__________
HEARD: Jun. 9, 1998
__________
Before KRASS, FLEMING, and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 5 through 7, the only claims pending in the
application.
The invention is directed to an object sensing device for
motor vehicles. More particularly, the invention employs a
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007