Appeal No. 95-2730 Application No. 08/169959 experimentation in practicing the claimed invention, that experimentation was clearly not undue as to make the disclosure nonenabling within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. Accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 5 through 7. The first operating mode concerns the situation where an object is standing still or is driving more slowly in the driver’s direction. Clearly, it was well known in the art that distance measuring devices can determine whether an object is standing still (the relative speed of the object is equal to that of the vehicle speed) or moving slower in the same direction as the vehicle (the relative speed of the object is less than the vehicle speed). The second operating mode concerns the situation where an object may be standing still or driving more slowly in the driver’s direction, as in the first mode, but also includes the situation where an object is coming towards the vehicle. Clearly, it was also known in the art how to determine when an object is coming towards the vehicle (the relative speed of the object is greater than the vehicle speed). 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007