Ex parte WEISHAUPT - Page 8




          Appeal No. 95-2730                                                          
          Application No. 08/169959                                                   

          distance measuring between vehicles and objects, it is our                  
          view that the examiner did not have a reasonable basis for                  
          challenging the sufficiency of the instant disclosure under                 
          the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112.  Alternatively, to the              
          extent the examiner had such a reasonable basis, appellant                  
          clearly has explained, through attorney argument and the                    
          declaration of appellant, how the artisan would have easily                 
          adapted the prior art devices, through a switching                          
          arrangement, in view of appellant’s disclosure, to implement                
          the claimed subject matter.                                                 




















                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007