Appeal No. 95-2730 Application No. 08/169959 distance measuring between vehicles and objects, it is our view that the examiner did not have a reasonable basis for challenging the sufficiency of the instant disclosure under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112. Alternatively, to the extent the examiner had such a reasonable basis, appellant clearly has explained, through attorney argument and the declaration of appellant, how the artisan would have easily adapted the prior art devices, through a switching arrangement, in view of appellant’s disclosure, to implement the claimed subject matter. 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007