THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ROBERT M. COVINGTON, JR. and ERNIE H. UNGER
________________
Appeal No. 95-2823
Application No. 08/078,3831
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, METZ and GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision
rejecting claims 1 through 7 and 10, which are all of the
claims remaining in the application. The examiner added a new
ground of rejection of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, fourth
paragraph (Answer,
1Application for patent filed June 17, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007