Ex parte COVINGTON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-2823                                                          
          Application No. 08/078,383                                                  


          of about 11.7%, a maximum polyunsaturated fatty acid content                
          (C +C ) of about 3.4%, and a maximum iodine value of about                  
            18:218:3                                                                  
          83.6.                                                                       
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          J. D. Bansal et al. (Bansal), "Effect of Hydrogenation on the               
          Chemical Composition of Canola Oil," 47 Journal of Food                     
          Science 1338-44 (1982)                                                      
          Unichema International (Unichema), Hydrogenation of Canola                  
          Oil, Pricat 9920 (1992)                                                     
               The issue presented for review is whether the examiner                 
          erred in rejecting claims 1 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as              
          unpatentable over "Unichema alone or in view of Bansal"                     
          (Answer, page 3).  For the reasons set forth below, we reverse              
          the examiner's prior art rejections.                                        
                                     DISCUSSION                                       
               Independent claim 1 requires that the shortening have a                
          maximum polyunsaturated fatty acid content (C +C ) of about                 
                                                       18:218:3                       
          3.4%.  Acknowledging that Unichema does not disclose "the                   
          particular extent of unsaturation" recited in claim 1, never-               
          theless, the examiner relies on Bansal, Figure 7, to reach                  
          that feature.  See the Examiner's Answer, page 4, lines 7                   
          through 12; and page 5, section (11) entitled "Response to                  
          argument," lines 4 through 9 thereunder.  This being the case,              
          we summarily reverse the rejection of claims 1 through 7 under              
                                         -3-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007