THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KOJI KINOSHITA
____________
Appeal No. 95-3159
Application No. 08/064,6781
____________
HEARD: June 8, 1998
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3
through 6 and 8 through 12. In a first Amendment After Final
(paper number 27), claims 2 and 7 were amended, and, in response
to this amendment, the examiner indicated (paper number 28) that
claims 2 and 7 were allowed. In a second Amendment After Final
(paper number 30), claims 3 and 12 were amended.
1Application for patent filed May 21, 1993. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/537,303, filed June 13, 1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007