THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOHANNES TENBRINK, PAUL PUNISKA,
VOLKER GLUECKLICH and KLAUS HEINE
__________
Appeal No. 95-3209
Application No. 08/020,3041
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the
examiner to allow claims 1 through 3, 6 through 11, 15 and 18
as amended subsequent to the final rejection. The only other
claims remaining in the application, which are claims 4 and 5,
1Application for patent filed February 19, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007