Appeal No. 95-3209
Application No. 08/020,304
the argument does not appear to be germane to the claims under
review since these claims do not require that the die or
roller temperatures be high enough to effect a molten
condition of any kind much less one which would be expected to
“result in breaking or tearing apart of the wire” as urged by
the appellants.
Under these circumstances, we will also sustain the § 103
rejection of claims 3, 7, 9 and 10 as being unpatentable over
Yamamoto in view of the admitted prior art and further in view
Takizawa.
Conclusion
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007