Ex parte TENBRINK et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-3209                                                          
          Application No. 08/020,304                                                  


          have been objected to by the examiner as depending from art                 
          rejected claims but otherwise allowable.                                    
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a method for                   
          manufacturing a superconductive composite member which                      
          comprises the step of hot-shaping an intermediate composite of              
          super- conductor material at a temperature such that the                    
          material is present in at least a partially molten state.                   
          This appealed subject matter is adequately illustrated by                   
          independent claim 1 which reads as follows:                                 

               1.   In a method for manufacturing a superconductive                   
          composite member by introducing an oxide ceramic                            
          superconductor material into an envelope to form an                         
          intermediate composite, shaping the intermediate composite                  
          into a final composite by a cross sectional-reducing, and                   
          thermal heat-treating the final composite for recovering and                
          for setting the oxygen concentration, the improvements                      
          comprising the shaping steps including heating the                          
          intermediate composite to a temperature at which the                        
          superconductor material is present in at least a partially                  
          molten state, and subjecting the intermediate composite at                  
          said temperature to at least one hot-shaping step.                          


               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Yamamoto et al. (Yamamoto)    5,169,831                Dec. 8,              
          1992                                                                        

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007