THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte LOUIS LU-CHEN HSU, CHANG-MING HSIEH,
and SEIKI OGURA
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3637
Application 07/968,7361
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and LEE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-4, and 9-15. Claims 5-8 have been
withdrawn from consideration. Claim 16 has been allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Lee 5,041,886 Aug. 20, 1991
1Application for patent filed October 30, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007