Appeal No. 95-3900 Page 8 Application No. 07/978,030 elements, all arranged as claimed." (Paper 21 at 3.) This finding is consistent with Rammos' subarrays. (5:44-58; Figs. 9-11.) Consequently, the preponderance of evidence supports the examiner's rejection of these claims. Claim 10 recites a frequency ("approximately 12 GHz") and a specific concavity spacing (5 mm). One-quarter wavelength at 12 GHz is 6.25 mm. (Rammos 5:12-13.) Rammos discloses only a 12 GHz array. Thus, a person having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to apply any of Rammos' embodiments to a 12 GHz array. Rammos teaches the use of a spacing distance between the printed circuit and the ground plane, H (4:4-6), such that H is at least 1 mm andL L "about / ", which at 12 GHz is 6.25 mm. (5:7-17.) The8 4 teaching of about is sufficient to motivate a person having ordinary skill in the art to optimize H starting at 6.25 mm. L Since thickness is a matter of concern in the art, the artisan would have been motivated to find an effective value below 6.25 mm. To the extent there is any criticality associatedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007