Ex parte HATWAR et al. - Page 7




            Appeal No. 95-4066                                                                         
            Application 07/963,189                                                                     


            a palladium content of from 1 to 15 atomic percent.                                        


                  Claim 4 depends from independent claim 1 and further                                 
            includes in the alloy of claim 1 copper in an amount less than                             
            30 atomic percent. Claim 10 depends from claim 7 and further                               
            includes in the silver-copper alloy of claim 7 from 1 to 15                                
            atomic percent palladium. Claim 15 depends from independent                                
            claim 13 and further requires in the alloy of claim 13 from 1                              
            to 30 atomic percent copper. Claim 20 depends from independent                             
            claim 17 and further includes in the alloy of claim 17 from 1                              
            to 30 atomic percent of copper.                                                            

                                               OPINION                                                 
                  The examiner's first stated rejection under 35 U.S.C. §                              
            103 over appellants' admission considered with Tomie,                                      
            Kobayashi, Takahashi and Shindo is apparently founded on the                               
            examiner's unsubstantiated position that a person of ordinary                              
            skill in the art would have been motivated to substitute for                               
            the admitted, conventional gold reflector layer, the reflector                             
            layer of Tomie as modified in accordance with Kobayashi,                                   
            Takahashi and Shindo. Thus, as a first error in his rejection,                             

                                                  7                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007