THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte STEVEN C. McMAHAN, KENNETH C. SCHEUER,
WILLIAM B. LEDBETTER, Jr.,
MICHAEL G. GALLUP and JAMES G. GAY
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4154
Application 08/122,1931
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, LEE and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 30-40, 43 and 45. Claims 41-42 and 44
have been objected to. No claim has been allowed.
1Application for patent filed September 15, 1993.
According to the appellants, it is a continuation of Application
07/931,187, filed August 17, 1992, now Patent No. 5,294,845,
which is a continuation of Application 07/632,901, filed December
24, 1990, now Patent No. 5,162,672.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007