Appeal No. 95-4154
Application 08/122,193
Regarding the rejection of claims 32, 33 and 43 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Asano and Anderson,
Anderson has been relied on only to show the "storage" aspect of
those claims and would not make up for the deficiency of Asano as
already discussed in connection with the anticipation rejection
and the obviousness rejection over Asano.
Accordingly, we do not sustain the obviousness rejection of
claims 32, 33 and 43 over Asano and Anderson.
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 30, 31 and 35-37 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as being anticipated by Asano is reversed.
The rejection of claims 32, 33 and 43 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Asano and Anderson is reversed.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007