THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte YUJI UEDA, NAOKI TAKEYAMA, HIROMI UEKI and TAKEHIRO KUSUMOTO _____________ Appeal No. 95-4663 Application 08/044,4871 ______________ HEARD: March 2, 1998 _______________ Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges. JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal pursuant to 35 USC § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1 through 13. Claim 1 is representative and is reproduced below: 1 Application for patent filed April 9, 1993. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007