THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROBERT S. SCHWARTZ
__________
Appeal No. 95-4847
Application No. 08/079,2221
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-11 and 29-32. At that point,
claims 12-28 and 33-47 had been withdrawn from consideration
Application for patent filed June 17, 1993. According to1
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/854,118, filed March 19, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007