THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MARK YOUNG
__________
Appeal No. 96-1432
Application 08/232,6001
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 9.
The disclosed invention relates to reduction of cache flushing in a cache memory system. Using
1Application for patent filed April 25, 1994. According to appellant, the application is a
continuation of Application 07/787,547, filed November 4, 1991, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007