Appeal No. 96-2179 Page 26
Application 07/613,466
We reverse the rejection of claims 25-37 and 49-61 under
the obviousness-type double-patenting doctrine as obvious
variants of the claims of Callaghan '900.
We affirm the rejection of claims 25-37 under the
obviousness-type double-patenting doctrine as obvious variants
of the claims of Callaghan '497.
We reverse the anticipation rejections of claims 25-27,
29, 34, 49-51, and 58 on the merits.
We reverse the obviousness rejections of claims 28, 30-
33, 35-37, 52-57, and 59-61 on the merits.
Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007