THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANTHONY M. BALISTRERI
and RICHARD SIMPSON
____________
Appeal No. 97-0614
Application No. 08/212,4651
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-12,
all the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to a random access memory. Claim
9 is illustrative and reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed March 11, 1994. According
to appellants, this application is a division of Application
07/676,624, filed March 28, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007