Ex parte SKOLNICK et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 97-1999                                                          
          Application 07/390,745                                                      
          intravenous                                                                 
               (i.v.), subcutaneous (s.c.), intramuscular (i.m.) and                  
               intraperitoneal (i.p.).                                                
               While Schroder certainly describes compositions                        
          comprising 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid or its lower                 
          alkyl esters in water (Schroder, col. 12, l. 29-58), with the               
          possible inclusion of “salts of iron, manganese, boron,                     
          copper, cobalt, molybdenum and zinc” (Schroder, col. 13, l.                 
          20-25), the compositions are taught to be useful for                        
          application to plants to regulate plant growth (Schroder, col.              
          21, Claim 1).  While we agree with the examiner that                        
          Schroder’s compositions for application to plants to regulate               
          growth may be sterile and may contain pharmaceutical grade                  
          carriers and pharmaceutically acceptable salts in amounts                   
          suitable for human injection, we find in Schroder no                        
          description of the pharmaceutical compositions appellants                   
          claim which would have reasonably placed that subject matter                
          in the possession of the public.  Accordingly, we reverse the               
          examiner’s rejection of Claims 15-21 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)               
          as anticipated by Schroder.                                                 
               B.   The Section 103 rejection                                         
               Appellants do not appear to contest the examiner’s                     
          finding that the combined teachings of Ross, Robinson, and                  
                                        - 6 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007