THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SEETHARAMAIAH MANNAVA, ALBERT E. MCDANIEL,
WILLIAM D. COWIE and HERBERT HALILA
____________
Appeal No. 97-2596
Application No. 08/319,3451
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 5, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
We REVERSE and enter a new rejection pursuant to 37 CFR
1Application for patent filed October 6, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007