Appeal No. 97-2596 Page 8 Application No. 08/319,345 three times greater. Lastly, Vaccari discloses that potential applications for laser shock peening include the blades, vanes, disks, etc. of turbines. Morikawa discloses a turbine wherein blades 1 are imbedded into wheel 2 at each cavity by a well-known method. As shown in Figures 2-6, Morikawa uses fir trees as the well-known method of imbedding the blades 1 to the wheel 2. Morikawa teaches to shot peen portions of the wheel (Figures 3 and 4) and the blades (Figures 5 and 6) which are subject to crack generation (see Figure 2) caused by stress generated by centrifugal force and temperature changes. In applying the test for obviousness, we reach the 3 conclusion that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the appellants' invention was made to subject the surfaces of both the dovetail root of the rotor blades and the dovetail slots of the rotor disk of the admitted prior art to peening as suggested by Morikawa to relieve the high 3The test for obviousness is what the combined teachings of the references would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art. See In re Young, 927 F.2d 588, 591, 18 USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991) and In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425, 208 USPQ 871, 881 (CCPA 1981).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007