Ex parte MANNAVA et al. - Page 3




                Appeal No. 97-2596                                                                                 Page 3                     
                Application No. 08/319,345                                                                                                    


                                                              BACKGROUND                                                                      
                         The appellants' invention relates to a laser shock peened                                                            
                dovetail assembly component.  Claim 1 is representative of the                                                                
                subject matter on appeal and a copy of claim 1, as it appears in                                                              
                the appendix to the appellants' brief, is attached to this                                                                    
                decision.                                                                                                                     


                         The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                
                examiner as evidence of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                                                                
                Morikawa et al.          2                59-70811                                  April 4, 1984                             
                (Morikawa)                                (Japan)                                                                             
                Vaccari, "Laser shocking extends fatigue life," American                                                                      
                Machinist, pages 62-62, July 1992                                                                                             

                         In addition, this panel of the Board will rely upon admitted                                                         
                prior art (see page 5, infra).                                                                                                


                         Claims 1 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                           
                being unpatentable over Morikawa in view of Vaccari.                                                                          





                         2In determining the teachings of Morikawa, we will rely on                                                           
                the translation provided by the PTO.  A copy of the translation                                                               
                is attached for the appellants' convenience.                                                                                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007