Ex parte MANNAVA et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 97-2596                                         Page 7           
          Application No. 08/319,345                                                  


          New ground of rejection                                                     
               Under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), we enter the                
          following new ground of rejection.                                          


               Claims 1 through 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over admitted prior art in view of Vaccari and           
          Morikawa.                                                                   


               Our review of the section entitled "Description of Related             
          Art" (specification, pp. 2-5) leads us to conclude that one                 
          skilled in the art would have taken the following to be admitted            
          prior art.  A gas turbine engine wherein the rotor blades have a            
          dovetail root received in dovetail slots of the rotor disk.  In             
          addition, it was known that both the dovetail root of the rotor             
          blades and the dovetail slots of the rotor disk were subjected to           
          high stresses and stress risers.                                            


               Vaccari discloses that laser shock peening has only recently           
          become a commercially feasible alternative to shot peening for              
          enhancing the fatigue life of metal parts.  Vaccari teaches that            
          compared to shot peening, laser shock peening develops at least             
          equivalent residual compressive stress, but to depths two-to-               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007