THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DALE F. SWARTS, WILLIAM L. ROHR JR., STEVE T. LIN
THIRUMALAI DEVANATHAN, STEVEN L. KREBS, and PAUL D. SCHOENLE
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2783
Application 08/388,0891
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 4 through 13 and 15. As noted on page 1
of appellants' brief (Paper No. 8), claims 2, 3 and 14 "are not
presented for Appeal and their final rejection has been accepted
by the Appellant."
Application for patent filed February 14, 1995.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007