THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TEDDY L. STEWART
____________
Appeal No. 98-1207
Application No. 08/420,6481
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 17 through 41, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed April 12, 1995. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/019,571, filed February 18, 1993, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,421,108, which was a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/765,537, filed September 25, 1991, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007