THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DEREK K. GAUGER and JOSEPH J. GRAJEWSKI
____________
Appeal No. 98-1455
Application No. 08/625,9361
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 20, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed April 1, 1996.
2Claims 10, 16, 17 and 20 were amended subsequent to the
final rejection. It is apparent that the examiner has
withdrawn the rejection of claims 10, 17 and 20 under 35
U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, made in the final rejection
since the answer does not set forth this rejection as a ground
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007