CAVANAGH V. MCMAHON et al. - Page 42




          Interference No. 102,668                                                    


                                      Judgment                                        
                    Judgment on the issue of priority with respect to                 
          the subject matter of the count is hereby awarded in favor of               
          McMahon and Jones, who are therefore entitled to their                      
          involved patent claims that correspond to the count, i.e.,                  
          claims 1-20.  Accordingly, judgment on the issue of priority                
          is hereby entered against Cavanagh, with the result that he is              
          not entitled to a patent including his application claims that              
          correspond to the count, i.e., claims 1-28.                                 





          ____________________________                                                
                         Stanley M. Urynowicz, Jr.    )                               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         ____________________________ )   BOARD OF                    
          PATENT                                                                      
                         William F. Pate, III         )     APPEALS AND               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               
          INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         ____________________________ )                               
                         John C. Martin               )                               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               



                                          - 42 -                                      





Page:  Previous  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007