THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WILLIAM D. EMMONS, MARTIN VOGEL,
EDWARD C. KOSTANSEK, JACK C. THIBEAULT and PETER R. SPERRY
________________
Appeal No. 94-0822
Application No. 07/801,9921
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-
10, 12-25 and 27-61, all the claims remaining in the present
application. Claim 1 is illustrative:
1Application for patent filed December 3, 1991.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007