THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ELLIS L. REINHERZ, JIRI NOVOTNY, STEPHEN T. SMILEY,
PING LI and RAMESH GANJU
________________
Appeal No. 94-1483
Application No. 07/695,1411
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges, and McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision
rejecting claims 2 through 16, 18, 20 through 22, 24 through
1Application for patent filed May 8, 1991. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/523,632, filed May 15, 1990, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007