Appeal No. 94-1483 Application No. 07/695,141 Description Requirement, 35 U.S.C. § 112, First Paragraph Claims 14 through 16, 18, 20 through 22, 24 through 28, and 32 through 34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as based on an inadequate written description of the claimed invention. These claims are drawn to (1) genetic material, including DNA; (2) an expression vector containing DNA; (3) a prokaryotic or eukaryotic host cell containing the expression vector; and (4) a method of culturing the host cell. They all fall short of complying with the written description requirement of the statute because appellants' specification does not provide the kind of specificity necessary to support them. As stated in Univ. of Cal. v. Eli Lilly and Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1566-69, 43 USPQ2d 1398, 1404-07 (Fed. Cir. 1997), an adequate written description of genetic material, such as DNA or cDNA, requires a precise definition, e.g., by structure, formula, chemical name, or physical properties. A mere wish or plan for obtaining the claimed chemical invention, or a general method for obtaining the genetic material involved, will not do. What is required is a description of the DNA -4-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007