THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CINDY B. S. TONG and KEVIN B. HICKS
____________
Appeal No. 95-1829
Application No. 08/068,0401
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, HANLON, and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 25, 38-47 and 49 (see Paper No. 10), all
of the claims pending in the application. The claims on
1Application for patent filed May 28, 1993. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/749,347, filed August 23, 1991, now U.S.
Patent 5,244,684, issued September 14, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007